SPN Question #1
Oct. 16th, 2008 01:25 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
There are a couple of things on my mind about Supernatural - actually more than a couple but I feel like talking about two of them today - so I am going to post them on my LJ. The first one is completely spoiler-free and only refers to the S4 eps that have already aired. The second question is based on the premise of next week's episode but I'll post that in a separate entry.
Please keep spoilers out of the comments. Thanks :)
I've heard that there is a fandom debate about Sam/Ruby and whether or not they are sleeping together. In the eps I've watched, I've noticed a deliberate attempt based on scene construction and word choice to imply they may be sleeping together, but these cues could equally be taken as misleads. By now, I'm fairly certain that the writers are doing it on purpose to stir the pot.
Honestly, while I dislike romance on SPN, I don't care if Sam's in a relationship with a demon. It's when I look at thd details I get squicked.
If he is sleeping with Ruby, he's sleeping with a girl that is an unwilling part of the relationship since she's just the host. If she's dead and Ruby is in a dead person's body, then he's sleeping with a corpse.
That's icky. Now, if they write it so that hmmm...when Sam was grieving Dean's death he hooked up with a girl for a fling and THEN he found out it was a girl possessed by Ruby, that wouldn't bug me so much, as long as he wasn't all like yay! and kept going. Still a bit creepy, but a bit better.
I don't know. Maybe I'm in the minority. I'm not going to throw a fandom hissy fit if they're having sex, but I don't want it LOL
I actually welcome morally ambigous stuff on this show because they are always consequences. But am I the only one hoping it's not the case?
Please keep spoilers out of the comments. Thanks :)
I've heard that there is a fandom debate about Sam/Ruby and whether or not they are sleeping together. In the eps I've watched, I've noticed a deliberate attempt based on scene construction and word choice to imply they may be sleeping together, but these cues could equally be taken as misleads. By now, I'm fairly certain that the writers are doing it on purpose to stir the pot.
Honestly, while I dislike romance on SPN, I don't care if Sam's in a relationship with a demon. It's when I look at thd details I get squicked.
If he is sleeping with Ruby, he's sleeping with a girl that is an unwilling part of the relationship since she's just the host. If she's dead and Ruby is in a dead person's body, then he's sleeping with a corpse.
That's icky. Now, if they write it so that hmmm...when Sam was grieving Dean's death he hooked up with a girl for a fling and THEN he found out it was a girl possessed by Ruby, that wouldn't bug me so much, as long as he wasn't all like yay! and kept going. Still a bit creepy, but a bit better.
I don't know. Maybe I'm in the minority. I'm not going to throw a fandom hissy fit if they're having sex, but I don't want it LOL
I actually welcome morally ambigous stuff on this show because they are always consequences. But am I the only one hoping it's not the case?
no subject
Date: 2008-10-16 06:28 pm (UTC)But then, based on what I've seen of Season 3 so far in conjunction with Season 4 I'm thinking Ruby - while awesome - is grooming Sam to become the General ol' yellow eyes wanted. That's purely hypothesis though.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-16 07:15 pm (UTC)I want to know what Ruby's plan is! *whines*
I'm just hoping it's a red herring.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-16 06:34 pm (UTC)So either they're not having sex at all and it's just a big tease, OR Ruby's host consented. I have no idea where they're going with Ruby, but I could see a possibility of blurring the lines some more and have a host who consented to, uh, time-share. Sort of like Tok'ra, instead of Goa'uld, I guess. Or more like those hosts who wanted to become Goa'uld, because they thought they were getting closer to their god. Maybe someone was willing to sacrifice herself to bring Ruby back because she is a devil worshipper or something? *shrug* I don't know, it's still squicky, but at least it would be more ambiguous.
I also don't think the actors have been directed to act as if they're lovers. I know she's not hugely experienced, so I don't know if she would be different, but certainly Jared would do a better job if that's the impression we were supposed to have. IMO, anyway! :)
Supernatural tonight! woot!
no subject
Date: 2008-10-16 07:19 pm (UTC)Yay SPN tonight!!
no subject
Date: 2008-10-16 06:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-16 07:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-16 07:06 pm (UTC)I dunno which would be creepier, actually...
*Shudders*
Then again, Sam had gotten a room with TWO beds when Ruby was with him - so...maybe not...
*Snuggles you*
no subject
Date: 2008-10-16 07:16 pm (UTC)Yeah, I just don't know. I see a lot of people debating it though. I'm hoping it's just a red herring :)